Hi Shawn.

----- Original Message -----
> We are (finally) looking at adding this ticket to our code.
> I'm a bit concerned about porting it into 4.1 and 4.2 as it
> changes what the user experience is a bit.
> 
> I believe it makes sense to add this to 4.3.1 but
> I'd like to hear your thoughts on including this functionality
> into 4.1 or 4.2. Are you already including it? have you seen
> any problems with script mis-behavior?

We are already including the patch in RHEL-6 shipping the 4.1.1-P1
version. AFAIK there have been no complains or mis-behaviour
caused by the patch.

The patch is also included since Fedora 18 which shipped the 4.2.5
version.

I'm CC-ing Jirka Popelka, the maintainer of ISC DHCP server in
RHEL/Fedora.

> I do plan to change the patch somewhat, basically adding
> a server_address type field into the client lease structure
> and treating it similar to the address field rather than passing
> the server address as an argument.
> 
> Shawn

This sounds reasonable. Since the exposed option name/format should
be the same it will not cause behaviour change compared to my original
patch.

Thank you for reviewing the patch and letting us know.

Regards,
-- 
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience

PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com