> Good morning, binders!
> 
> "number of zones" in the output of "rndc status" is great, but splitting
> it into "number of automatic zones" and "number of our zones" (bad
> wording but I can't think of anything at the moment) would be nice... ie:

By "automatic" I guess you mean empty zones, i.e. RFC 1918 reverse zones
and such?

> number of zones: 102
> number of automatic zones: 98
> number of our zones: 4

or maybe a breakdown:

  number of zones: 102 (4/98)

(This opens up the thought of even further breakdowns -- how many
configured via addzone vs named.conf, how many slaves vs. masters, etc.)