----- Original Message -----
> ----- Original Message -----
> > > I'll wait for your opinion and work on the separate support in the
> > > meantime.
> > 
> > Your opinion is probably at least as well-informed as ours.  Nobody's
> > asked us about IDN in a while, which is why it hasn't been touched in
> > so long.  What does your specific customer use case require?
> 
> It is a Fedora request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098783
> 
> The problem is that some IDN domains are translated differently using
> IDNA2003 and IDNA2008. So users have to translate some domains manually
> to get to the desired site.

Hi.

I prepared a patch that is adding two new configure options
--with-libidn and --with-libidn2.

It also renames the existing --with-idn to --with-idnkit to
be more clear on its purpose.

Please let me know if you see anything that could be improved.

Thank you in advance for your feedback.

Regards,
-- 
Tomas Hozza
Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience

PGP: 1D9F3C2D
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com