In message , "Robert Edmonds v ia RT" writes: > Mark Andrews via RT wrote: > > I don't care what RFC 6844 says here. Once the code point is > > allocated the code point format is frozen. I also asked PHB about it and he confirmed it was ASCII only. This needs a erratra to say it is ASCII only. > Hi, Mark: > > In that case, why does BIND implement the URI RR format as specified by > RFC 7553 (actually, draft-faltstrom-uri-08), and not the URI RR format > as specified by the I-D at the point in time the URI RR type code point > was allocated? > > 3906. [protocol] Update URI record format to comply with > draft-faltstrom-uri-08. [RT #36642] Yes, I'm aware of that. I also don't like the change. One of the problems with expert review is that sloppy specs get through. > -- > Robert Edmonds > > > > -- > Ticket History: https://bugs.isc.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=41900 -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org