Hi Shawn,

Just checking: was this intended for me?  (It looks like the middle of 
an internal discussion)

Thanks,
David

On 07/06/2016 11:06 PM, Shawn Routhier via RT wrote:
> On Wed Jul 06 13:07:59 2016, tmark wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I believe we concluded that there would be problems with the ping
>>> code
>>> if the user set the time value to be < 60 seconds but we were okay
>>> with that
>>> as an unlikely set up. We should mention it in the documentation.
>>
>> Actually, since I changed the ping check logic to test to:
>>
>> (cltt > 60) || (state == FTS_ABANDONED)
>>
>> it really doesn't matter what value they use.
>>
>
> Doesn't the lease get moved back to the FREE state after the timeout period?
> So if they use something like 30 then 30 seconds after the last touch the lease
> goes from ABANDONED to FREE and if we still have the previous CLTT it would
> be less than 60.  I took a quick look and didn't see CLTT being cleared but I
> may have missed it.
>
>
>

-- 
David Zych
Lead Network Service Engineer
University of Illinois Technology Services