On Mon Jul 11 21:07:33 2016, dmrz@illinois.edu wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> I like your parameter solution very much, and I confirm that the patch
> successfully prevents the problem scenarios I originally reported --
> thanks!
> 
> However, there's a variant scenario whose behavior still seems wrong:

Hi David,

Thank you for testing the patch.  We shall look into the scenario you
described soon but as we may take several days (or more) to get to
it I wanted to acknowledge your message sooner.

regards,
shawn