In message , "Cathy Almond via RT" writes: > On Thu Jun 22 20:26:14 2017, muks wrote: > > RFC 2136 covers this: > > > > 7.18. Previously existing names which are occluded by a new zone cut > > are still considered part of the parent zone, for the purposes of > > zone transfers, even though queries for such names will be referred > > to the new subzone's servers. If a zone cut is removed, all parent > > zone names that were occluded by it will again become visible to > > queries. (This is a clarification of [RFC1034].) > > > > Occlusion is not an error. A similar situation can occur with DNAME > > too. > > > > Mukund > > Ah OK - in that case, I think there is nothing we can reasonable do > here, unless we think it worthwhile to add a warning. Well we could add a mode that checks for non-glue below bottom of zone but it would have to be documented as being beyond what it technically required. This policy not correctness enforcement. > Cathy > > -- > Ticket History: https://bugs.isc.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=45416 -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org