On Wed Nov 15 09:24:16 2017, fdupont wrote:
> On Wed Nov 15 07:18:41 2017, ondrej wrote:
> > JFTR allow_query serve-stale rpzrecurse have already been modify to
> > run in parallel.
> > 
> > Note: I think the random port allocation is enough for the tests, but
> > if you want to make it more robust a script that would lock, allocate,
> > check the port, unlock should be made.  But I strongly believe it's
> > not necessary for low number of tests and 32k ports available.
> 
> => 32k available but 1/2 collision probability after ~180 ports.

We have 103 system tests now and only the most time critical are being ported.

> More seriously I really prefer the "more robust" option as I
> run tests on an other purpose machine. BTW a feature which
> is very useful in some cases should come for free (i.e. just
> check it works) with random is to be able to run simultaneously;
> the same test on different builds.

If you provide the script that will print the usable port number to stdout, we would integrate it.