MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rt-3.8.6-60449-1284596271-1144.22096-5-0@isc.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
References: <RT-Ticket-22096@isc.org> <38C0BFD50092414E900DEE15F8976FE0@sb.litts.net> <rt-3.8.6-60453-1284580962-1742.22096-5-0@isc.org> <AA666FB582F2412991E8AE7F9568631A@sb.litts.net> <rt-3.8.6-60449-1284596271-1144.22096-5-0@isc.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at overkill.sb.litts.net
Message-ID: <238C40BCF54D4886B8F4BBFFE3E6427E@sb.litts.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0EB20EE277 for <bind-suggest@bugs.isc.org>; Mon,  1 Nov 2010 20:08:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nano.litts.net (nano.litts.net [96.233.62.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.litts.net", Issuer "litts.net Trust Root" (not verified)) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAF5A5F983B for <bind-suggest@isc.org>; Mon,  1 Nov 2010 20:08:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from litt@acm.org)
Received: from screamxp (screamxp.sb.litts.net [192.168.148.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by nano.litts.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oA1K872r020549 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for <bind-suggest@isc.org>; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:08:08 -0400
Delivered-To: bind-suggest@bugs.isc.org
Subject: RE: [ISC-Bugs #22096] FW: Statistics channel patch 
Return-Path: <litt@acm.org>
X-Original-To: bind-suggest@bugs.isc.org
Thread-Index: ActVNJ/tpR6yEa+ZT3KyAQYctcoknwkyv/Ew
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:08:07 -0400
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mx.ams1.isc.org
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994
To: <bind-suggest@isc.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Timothe Litt" <litt@acm.org>
RT-Message-ID: <rt-3.8.6-62597-1288642106-892.22096-0-0@isc.org>
Content-Length: 577

 
I haven't updated my patch - but have realized that one other piece of
configuration information that will be needed is the zone type - as in
{master, slave, stub}.

In my immediate case, this is because a GUI shouldn't offer the opportunity
to modify a stub, and a view containing only stub and perhaps built-in zones
isn't interesting to (most) humans.

I'd appreciate it if this was included in your work.  

Thanks.


---------------------------------------------------------
This communication may not represent my employer's views,
if any, on the matters discussed.