X-Scanned-BY: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <rt-3.8.6-62597-1290641910-1422.22033-5-0@isc.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
References: <RT-Ticket-22033@isc.org> <4C812D59.50503@redhat.com> <rt-3.8.6-62597-1290641910-1422.22033-5-0@isc.org>
Message-ID: <4CEE7394.7060203@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF7020EE275 for <dhcp-bugs@bugs.isc.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:33:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4468B5F983B for <dhcp-bugs@isc.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jpopelka@redhat.com)
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAPEWrCO026175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <dhcp-bugs@isc.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:32:53 -0500
Received: from dhcp-24-236.brq.redhat.com (dhcp-24-236.brq.redhat.com [10.34.24.236]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAPEWqm0004917 for <dhcp-bugs@isc.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:32:52 -0500
Delivered-To: dhcp-bugs@bugs.isc.org
Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #22033] dhcp-4.2.0 uses int for handling time values
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.6
Return-Path: <jpopelka@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: dhcp-bugs@bugs.isc.org
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:32:52 +0100
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mx.ams1.isc.org
To: dhcp-bugs@isc.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jiri Popelka <jpopelka@redhat.com>
RT-Message-ID: <rt-3.8.6-62589-1290695590-1550.22033-0-0@isc.org>
Content-Length: 428

On 11/25/2010 12:38 AM, Shawn Routhier via RT wrote:
> Thank you for the bug report. We've chose a different solution in order to
> limit what gets passed into the isc_interval_set call. I'm attaching a copy of
> the diff to the ticket. I would appreciate it if you can verify the fix
> (assuming the testbed is still available).
Hi,

I verify that the diff you sent me fixes the problem.

Jiri
> Cut here for diff
>
> <snip>