MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX autolearn=no version=3.3.1 References: Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B977D20EE269 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f177.google.com (mail-iy0-f177.google.com [209.85.210.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (not verified)) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B5EFC9422 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db.pub.mail@gmail.com) Received: by iyj21 with SMTP id 21so89657iyj.8 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:59:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.200 with SMTP id u8mr7733256ibu.151.1296025195570; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:59:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.170.132 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:59:35 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: dhcp-bugs@bugs.isc.org Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #23006] AutoReply: test Domainkey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=oXRWRTqyxPGc/l0hSy4zyWaWT0jUZt301hJXy/LIvu/GK4621HdSgUXOImYmhWAFdj AFyFqesIOyN0rty37PMAyRXvjbo9ufLkrt479b0HsTnzYZjthluclwd6gnVx+tZRn4Oc 7931phNmcci+xik8soJToSCC8IHkvi+FZqvLA= Return-Path: Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=NxkvyG3sJzS1w4yB+T9w+R2UgVSJFayTeI9PUMnngjU=; b=ttwAqaMGL3FXbhQBvntPD12TPWXgLYjWJkSSEhDqUflUcn0AmeG+0sbj5HX9gaTWDN eTmsfBTlyykHe437b8qTa2L2DTTGYZ/qSBS9Z8a1fVeMFSkkno4nBfMO53au7VHA99vS 8RKV9x4rAmDkjA6lFNXPLH46JCHCin8EEEdqA= X-Original-To: dhcp-bugs@bugs.isc.org Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:59:35 +1100 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mx.pao1.isc.org To: dhcp-bugs@isc.org From: dave b RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 412 Hi I was actually wondering if bug 19839 was ever fixed. [0] I also find it hard to believe that there is no *public* bug tracker for isc-dhcp. On a side note the isc mailman site, https://lists.isc.org, is running an ancient version of mailman which is vulnerable to a number bug known bugs. [0] - http://mandriva.598463.n5.nabble.com/Bug-51179-dhcp-NEW-dhclient-crashes-with-a-buffer-overflow-td674983.html