MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 References: <4DB2F2D7.3020805@dev.mellanox.co.il> Message-ID: <4E259F52.3030900@dev.mellanox.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856AC20EE26D for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FAD85F992E for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:14:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hal@dev.mellanox.co.il) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so3579064wwj.26 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.10.210 with SMTP id q18mr6765567wbq.44.1311088478520; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-71-192-10-85.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [71.192.10.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm4429166wbw.19.2011.07.19.08.14.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:14:35 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: dhcp-bugs@bugs.isc.org Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #24249] [PATCH 2/2] Add DHCP over IPoIB per IETF RFC 4390 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dhcp-bugs@bugs.isc.org Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:14:26 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mx.ams1.isc.org To: dhcp-bugs@isc.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Hal Rosenstock RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 658 Hi, On 4/25/2011 3:13 PM, Shawn Routhier via RT wrote: > Hi Hal, > > As you may have noticed each time you send mail to our ticket > system it opens a new ticket. As the 3 tickets for IPoIB should > be handled as a unit I've merged them into a single ticket > 24245. If you want to update the ticket for some reason you > can reply to the automated response (or this response) and > your updates will be attached to the same ticket. > > Thank you for the patch and we'll try and review it figure out if and > when it should be included in a release. Any update on this item ? If not, any idea when you might get to it ? Thanks! -- Hal > Shawn > >