X-Scanned-BY: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 References: <53428B8B.7060303@redhat.com> <20140407143004.5EEAA12912F9@rock.dv.isc.org> Message-ID: <5342B985.9030400@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Organization: Red Hat X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D45C2D20572 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D68934944B for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pspacek@redhat.com) Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s37EhIcH027459 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:43:18 -0400 Received: from pspacek.brq.redhat.com (pspacek.brq.redhat.com [10.34.4.156]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s37EhG9l003460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:43:18 -0400 Delivered-To: bind-suggest@bugs.isc.org Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #35707] Support for draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance ? User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind-suggest@bugs.isc.org Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 16:43:17 +0200 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mx.pao1.isc.org To: bind-suggest@isc.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Petr Spacek RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 1042 On 7.4.2014 16:30, Mark Andrews via RT wrote: > In message , "Petr Spacek via > RT" writes: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to know if you are planning to support >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-03 >> in a near future. >> >> It seems that sections 3 and 5 are stable and rest of the draft seems to be >> not very interesting for DNS servers. >> >> I wonder if you can: >> - add support for CDS and CDNSKEY records > > It's a little early to ask for CDNSKEY as there is no type code assigned. I'm sorry! I have seen code 59 for CDS and (wrongly) anticipated that CDNSKEY is also assigned ... Thank you for your time once again! Petr^2 Spacek > >> - add a switch (for in-line signing and dnssec-signzone) "always copy all >> DNSKEY records to CDNSKEY records and also to CDS records". >> >> IMHO this behavior is allowed: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-03# >> section-5 >> >> Thank you for your time.