CC: Jiri Popelka MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.6_GA_5922 (ZimbraWebClient - FF29 (Linux)/8.0.6_GA_5922) References: <1406909280.808356.1365004211830.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <1398221948.809003.1365004309509.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1630184276.169622.1399274770000.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAD52D20051 for ; Mon, 5 May 2014 07:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com (mx4-phx2.redhat.com [209.132.183.25]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05313493C1 for ; Mon, 5 May 2014 07:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thozza@redhat.com) Received: from zmail19.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail19.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.22]) by mx4-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s457QAhp016111; Mon, 5 May 2014 03:26:10 -0400 Delivered-To: dhcp-suggest@bugs.isc.org Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #33098] dhclient does not exposes next-server DHCPv4 option to dhclient script Return-Path: X-Original-To: dhcp-suggest@bugs.isc.org Thread-Index: 1xUNIZxIwphE8tJrtpAGkhdMu47xdw== Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 03:26:10 -0400 (EDT) Thread-Topic: dhclient does not exposes next-server DHCPv4 option to dhclient script X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mx.pao1.isc.org X-Originating-Ip: [10.5.82.11] To: dhcp-suggest@isc.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Tomas Hozza RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 1333 Hi Shawn. ----- Original Message ----- > We are (finally) looking at adding this ticket to our code. > I'm a bit concerned about porting it into 4.1 and 4.2 as it > changes what the user experience is a bit. > > I believe it makes sense to add this to 4.3.1 but > I'd like to hear your thoughts on including this functionality > into 4.1 or 4.2. Are you already including it? have you seen > any problems with script mis-behavior? We are already including the patch in RHEL-6 shipping the 4.1.1-P1 version. AFAIK there have been no complains or mis-behaviour caused by the patch. The patch is also included since Fedora 18 which shipped the 4.2.5 version. I'm CC-ing Jirka Popelka, the maintainer of ISC DHCP server in RHEL/Fedora. > I do plan to change the patch somewhat, basically adding > a server_address type field into the client lease structure > and treating it similar to the address field rather than passing > the server address as an argument. > > Shawn This sounds reasonable. Since the exposed option name/format should be the same it will not cause behaviour change compared to my original patch. Thank you for reviewing the patch and letting us know. Regards, -- Tomas Hozza Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience PGP: 1D9F3C2D Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com