CC: undisclosed-recipients: ; MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline References: <5374D40E.3040207@info2intel.com> Message-ID: <20140515155105.GC7418@isc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.48.19]) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B1C2D20571 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 15:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 78E19216C31; Thu, 15 May 2014 15:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bind9-bugs@bugs.isc.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #36015] Feature request - break out # of automatic zones from "rndc status" zone count Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind9-bugs@bugs.isc.org Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 15:51:05 +0000 To: aclegg via RT From: Evan Hunt RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 608 > Good morning, binders! > > "number of zones" in the output of "rndc status" is great, but splitting > it into "number of automatic zones" and "number of our zones" (bad > wording but I can't think of anything at the moment) would be nice... ie: By "automatic" I guess you mean empty zones, i.e. RFC 1918 reverse zones and such? > number of zones: 102 > number of automatic zones: 98 > number of our zones: 4 or maybe a breakdown: number of zones: 102 (4/98) (This opens up the thought of even further breakdowns -- how many configured via addzone vs named.conf, how many slaves vs. masters, etc.)