CC: undisclosed-recipients: ; MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline References: <1807512246.5806763.1401107982420.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1738085611.5809889.1401108711247.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20140526160753.GA58166@isc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.48.19]) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BADF2D20571 for ; Mon, 26 May 2014 16:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 2C3CB216C31; Mon, 26 May 2014 16:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bind-suggest@bugs.isc.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #36101] IDN support in host/dig/nslookup using GNU libidn(2) Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind-suggest@bugs.isc.org Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 16:07:53 +0000 To: Tomas Hozza via RT From: Evan Hunt RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 688 > I'm not sure if there is already a ISC-Bugs # number for this. However > I would like to know if you would be interested in adding support > for libidn. Yes. > - introduce new configure option to turn on the usage of GNU libidn > (something like --with-gnu-libidn) > - use libidn2 for IDN -> ACE conversion (as libidn2 suppoerts IDNA2008 [1] > whereas libidn supports only IDNA2003) > - use libidn for ACE -> IDN conversion where needed (as libidn2 apparently > does not include support for this) Pardon my confusion here, but do you mean that two different versions of libidn would be in use at the same time? -- Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.