CC: undisclosed-recipients: ; MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline References: <1738085611.5809889.1401108711247.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20140526160753.GA58166@isc.org> <2058734996.6124128.1401208390989.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <359623256.6442984.1401293423461.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20140528163048.GA81134@isc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.48.19]) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8572D20571 for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 16:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 1F53D216C3B; Wed, 28 May 2014 16:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bind-suggest@bugs.isc.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #36101] IDN support in host/dig/nslookup using GNU libidn(2) Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind-suggest@bugs.isc.org Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 16:30:48 +0000 To: Tomas Hozza via RT From: Evan Hunt RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 347 > I'll wait for your opinion and work on the separate support in the meantime. Your opinion is probably at least as well-informed as ours. Nobody's asked us about IDN in a while, which is why it hasn't been touched in so long. What does your specific customer use case require? -- Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.