From glasgow@beer.net Wed Oct 7 16:51:44 2015 In-Reply-To: from Cathy Almond via RT at "Oct 2, 2015 08:29:10 am" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] X-RT-Interface: API content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-ID: <201510071651.t97Gpdpk085428@dark.beer.net> X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3972371B583 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dark.beer.net (dark.beer.net [204.145.225.20]) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF2B1FCCB3 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dark.beer.net (glasgow@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dark.beer.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t97GpdSv085429 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:51:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from glasgow@localhost) by dark.beer.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id t97Gpdpk085428 for dhcp-bugs@isc.org; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:51:39 -0500 (CDT) Delivered-To: dhcp-bugs@bugs.isc.org Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #38699] dhcp-4.2.5-27.0.1.el7_0.2 - dhcrelay drops responses inappropriately Return-Path: X-Original-To: dhcp-bugs@bugs.isc.org Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:51:39 -0500 (CDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mx.ams1.isc.org To: dhcp-bugs@isc.org From: "Michael Glasgow" RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 783 Cathy Almond via RT wrote: > Many thinks for taking the time and trouble to write up your use case. > > On the basis of your response, we are now considering potential > changes to the relay code in relation to interfaces - but this > ticket will still have to compete for engineering resources against > other worthy bug reports and feature requests. So whether or not > anything is done is not definite. > > But I thought you might like to know that your input has in fact > caused us to reconsider our stance, even though we might not be > able to address the issue in the immediate future. Thanks for your response. I can certainly understand your challenges with dev priority, but I'm glad my info was useful nonetheless. Take care, -- Michael Glasgow