From each@isc.org Wed Mar 9 22:43:07 2016 CC: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-RT-Interface: API References: <20160309205325.GA9403@mycre.ws> <20160309214631.GA25960@isc.org> <20160309221444.GA13890@mycre.ws> Message-ID: <20160309224307.GB25960@isc.org> content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7569871B5A8 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 5F923216C1E; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bind9-bugs@bugs.isc.org Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #41900] Unpresentable records cause AXFR failure? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind9-bugs@bugs.isc.org Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:43:07 +0000 To: "Robert Edmonds via RT" From: "Evan Hunt" RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 403 On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:14:48PM +0000, Robert Edmonds via RT wrote: > In the case where you have to render an unpresentable CAA record (for > instance because you might be writing a text master file format zone to > disk), couldn't you just fall back on RFC 3597 generic presentation > format for the record data? E.g., > > caa.example. IN CAA \# 03 00 01 20 Very smart suggestion, thank you.