X-GM-Message-State: AIVw1139+Uv7eWyMJfTjZJfDLHBubJH+C9eUzw6eBM+cecMjeEopD9cq sKOGVtQN0OXivJ0Lnco55g== Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 14:37:50 -0400 To: bind9-confidential@isc.org References: <20170715181542.GB64927@isc.org> X-Received: by 10.31.83.193 with SMTP id h184mr8461241vkb.17.1500143911729; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 11:38:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.237.57.71 with SMTP id l65mr17931849qte.82.1500143911113; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 11:38:31 -0700 (PDT) content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: "Jeremy Bicha" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-RT-Incoming-Encryption: Not encrypted X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: From jeremy@bicha.net Sat Jul 15 18:38:35 2017 X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Delivered-To: bind9-confidential@bugs.isc.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mx.pao1.isc.org Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.pao1.isc.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 771F8D78AE8 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 18:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f41.google.com (mail-vk0-f41.google.com [209.85.213.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68B7349314 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 18:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y70so60262701vky.3 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 11:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qt0-f172.google.com (mail-qt0-f172.google.com. [209.85.216.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b137sm2873556vka.34.2017.07.15.11.38.31 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 15 Jul 2017 11:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r30so82930847qtc.0 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 11:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.200.46.79 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 11:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #45559] Modernize 'dig' acronym expansion Message-ID: X-RT-Interface: Email MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Return-Path: X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=mGy7n2Q1o8R3+OO9SmbOdC4XD1mTvImKv+VtFZxM4b4=; b=gL19jAtBKqp4b5RMHx4NVUiFPvWxtvA21hV4qYoo3BNSfp/d39bzFTg4RT7XMsDOuW ryUFy2+J3KDuPoOWbLSGiQ6eBKK2wlNWayEvEd+0Yw/HZxuNy4vG4CpFh2XXFbzaUkLz 4gcJ8SNFbI/CMfb+icUCCk354MGzN/RLEkk7SlnUpwiUBdkVI21PQs+isXNzfOrhchBc UKLz1kZfuV8HCz0WCIXv9x+xrVM9x6GaAvbaK1WP4rcwEOFSWItAmU44/WRMLJy3SdeQ axYa4EWUP7F8JsLFDYBvZQ2H1AZqHU6ANHEutpK+T6ZVNHXbZ7LsEA01TOgL/O4Wr/kj SyMw== X-Original-To: bind9-confidential@bugs.isc.org RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 491 On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Evan Hunt via RT wrote: > Maybe we just don't need to expand the abbreviation in the man page anymore. That's fine with me too. 'dig' doesn't need to be an acronym in my opinion. On the other hand, it will be a bit easier to start cleaning up all the references to the (old) acronym expansion if either a new acronym was used or if there was an official public announcement that 'dig' is no longer an acronym. Thanks, Jeremy