User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 In-Reply-To: X-Original-To: bind9-confidential@bugs.isc.org To: bind9-confidential@isc.org X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Delivered-To: bind9-confidential@bugs.isc.org References: <4047355f-73fd-b201-18e8-72f73e4bdaa0@isc.org> content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RT-Incoming-Encryption: Not encrypted Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ams1.isc.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42F7AD78AA1 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46F7E24AE0B for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1794116003A for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067A816005B for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 6MiaySjBNTiX for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rays-mbp.local (unknown [46.227.151.81]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9431216003A for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Message-ID: <08af6977-fa5c-f68f-a360-ca8b759b3010@isc.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mx.ams1.isc.org From ray@isc.org Tue Jul 25 12:29:11 2017 Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #45611] dig's handling of OPT RRs X-RT-Interface: Email Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ray Bellis" Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:29:05 +0100 RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 387 Furthermore, it seems that if an OPT RR is put on the command line, and then another within the batch file, any _subsequent_ OPT RRs on later batch file lines are ignored, and only the previous ones used. If no OPT RR is put on the command line then individual OPT RRs within the batch file are processed as expected (until the aforementioned limit of 100 accumulated RRs is reached).