To: bind-bugs@isc.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mx.pao1.isc.org Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 02:57:44 +0000 Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.pao1.isc.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E3D9D78AFB for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 02:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from iscwebprod.isc.org (iscwebprod.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:1:d::16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C03349B93 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 02:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www (uid 80) (envelope-from www@iscwebprod.isc.org) id 7b7d08 by iscwebprod.isc.org (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.11); Mon, 04 Sep 2017 02:57:44 +0000 Message-ID: <9a6a4b293befa8df0ec90ed6355bb07e@www.isc.org> From: "sauteed" From www@isc.org Mon Sep 4 02:57:47 2017 X-RT-Incoming-Encryption: Not encrypted X-PHP-Originating-Script: 20001:class-phpmailer.php Return-Path: Subject: BIND-9.9.6-P1 - error sending response: unset X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.22 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer) content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Original-To: bind9-bugs@bugs.isc.org Delivered-To: bind9-bugs@bugs.isc.org X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 X-RT-Interface: Email Content-Length: 664 Bug Report from www.isc.org: Name: sauteed Email: sauteeed@gmail.com Software Version: BIND-9.9.6-P1 OS: CentOS 6.4 Subject:error sending response: unset Bug Detail =========== Hi, I got 2 servers running the same version of BIND and OS, but one of them periodically encounters the problem "error sending response: unset", and when this took place, server just failed to send DNS responses to the clients. I don't see any difference between these 2 servers themselves. Maybe something outside could lead it to such a case? Any kind of advice will be appreciated. Thank you. Have a nice day. --- This email was received through isc.org Bug Submission Form