MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RT-Interface: Web Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" References: <6166e45c-cd9c-66fd-f91e-5fbaa835f9cd@isc.org> <20170908214407.GC44967@isc.org> <20170908235335.3589B84BD3A9@rock.dv.isc.org> Message-ID: X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.508 (Entity 5.508) RT-Send-CC: Content-Length: 1157 The tests look fine. We should still plan to add more testing in the future. On Fri Sep 08 16:55:00 2017, marka wrote: > > In message , "Evan > Hunt via R > T" writes: > > [ NOTE: This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s): ] > > > > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 07:52:06PM +0000, Ray Bellis via RT wrote: > > > I still find them massively convenient when trying to see what has > > > actually changed in a branch when master has subsequently diverged > > > from > > > that point. > > > > Use "git diff master...". > > > > Note: "master " means one thing, "master.." (two > > dots) > > means another thing, and "master..." (three dots) is the one > > you > > want. It shows the changes that have been applied to the branch > > since the branch point, regardless of what's in the master branch > > now. > > It's exactly the same as diffing against a base tag. > > It's actually better as you can merge master back into the branch > and see how it differs from master as of this merge. > > > -- > > Ticket History: https://bugs.isc.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=45186