Message-ID: <20171006173420.GC76109@isc.org> CC: X-Original-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #46201] Add isc_buffer_printf() From: "Evan Hunt" Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 17:34:20 +0000 X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-RT-Incoming-Encryption: Not encrypted From each@isc.org Fri Oct 6 17:34:21 2017 Delivered-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org References: <20171006075232.GA18759@jurassic> content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RT-Interface: Email In-Reply-To: Return-Path: Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.48.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 167EBD78B0A for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 17:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id DA630216C3B; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 17:34:20 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) To: "Mukund Sivaraman via RT" RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 422 > Print to string: (s)printf > Print to file: (f)printf > Print to buffer: (isc_buffer_)printf True, and I did think of that, but my brain tends to look at what's after the last underscore as the main indicator of what a function does, so to me isc_buffer_printf() sounds like it should print the content of a buffer to stdout. However, since I seem to be the only one with that quirk, I'm fine with the original name.