From each@isc.org Fri Oct 20 17:29:18 2017 Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.48.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDAFAD78B0A for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 17:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 97BC1216C3D; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 17:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 17:29:18 +0000 CC: Message-ID: <20171020172918.GD38987@isc.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #46289] Make nsec3param_salt_totext() part of public libdns API X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 X-RT-Interface: Email To: "Michał Kępień via RT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Evan Hunt" X-RT-Incoming-Encryption: Not encrypted Content-Disposition: inline Delivered-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org X-Original-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org References: <20171018052617.GA8139@isc.org> RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 326 On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:20:14AM +0000, Michał Kępień via RT wrote: > Agreed. Is this already annotated as [func] anywhere? rt46289 does not > seem to include a CHANGES update. Did you just mean to point this out > _before_ CHANGES is updated? Yes. I meant there was no reason it needed to be committed before beta.