Message-ID: <20171027163929.GA46698@isc.org> Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #46410] should dlv.isc.org be a nonfatal warning? X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 From each@isc.org Fri Oct 27 16:39:30 2017 Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:39:29 +0000 X-RT-Incoming-Encryption: Not encrypted User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-RT-Interface: Email References: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Evan Hunt" content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: "Cathy Almond via RT" Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 118FFD78B0C for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id D2EC7216C1E; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org X-Original-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org Return-Path: RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 349 > - if dnssec-lookaside is explicitly configured using another server, log this during start-up (mentioning that the configuration is permitted because it does not use dlv.isc.org) This seems excessively noisy to me. We disabled isc.dlv.org, not the lookaside feature; if they have a different domain, then they're just using a feature correctly.