Message-ID: <20171029054134.GA61978@isc.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Content-Disposition: inline Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FC21D78B0C for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 05:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 4467E216C1E; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 05:41:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org References: <20170524155413.GA31431@jurassic> <20171029024937.GA11619@jurassic.lan.banu.com> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 05:41:34 +0000 Delivered-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org CC: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #45282] Produce NSIS installer for Windows To: "Mukund Sivaraman via RT" X-RT-Interface: Email X-RT-Incoming-Encryption: Not encrypted MIME-Version: 1.0 From each@isc.org Sun Oct 29 05:41:35 2017 content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: "Evan Hunt" X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Return-Path: RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 620 On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 02:49:51AM +0000, Mukund Sivaraman via RT wrote: > I put it into the queue because I want a review of what's done so far. I > don't want to implement the configure x.in -> x changes until it is > reviewed as something we can use in its current form. Well, I read the code, and it looked reasonable, but I don't know the language it's written in, so there could easily be subtleties that I would've missed. I haven't tried a test install, but I assume you have... and I would definitely like a more up-to-date installer. Based on that, I think it's a good idea and well worth pursuing further.