CC: 
Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #46592] Use DNS_NAME_INITABSOLUTE and DNS_NAME_INITNONABSOLUTE in 9.9 and 9.10
content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
From: "Evan Hunt" <each@isc.org>
Message-ID: <20171127021103.GA59385@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.1-58073-1511737760-503.46592-4-0@isc.org>
X-Original-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:11:03 +0000
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
X-RT-Incoming-Encryption: Not encrypted
X-RT-Interface: Email
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE09FD78B0B for <bind9-public@bugs.isc.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:11:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 51E83216C1C; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 02:11:03 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RT-Ticket-46592@isc.org> <rt-4.4.1-23621-1510626568-661.46592-4-0@isc.org> <rt-4.4.1-58073-1511735069-1075.46592-4-0@isc.org> <787E26E2-0B51-422D-B2DA-E860A3F92E01@isc.org> <rt-4.4.1-58073-1511737760-503.46592-4-0@isc.org>
To: "Mark Andrews via RT" <bind9-public@isc.org>
From each@isc.org  Mon Nov 27 02:11:03 2017
Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
RT-Message-ID: <rt-4.4.1-51571-1511748667-528.46592-0-0@isc.org>
Content-Length: 333

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 11:09:20PM +0000, Mark Andrews via RT wrote:
> It would be a functional change then.  Currently this is just keeping the code mostly consistent between versions.

They're macros, not functions. It wouldn't affect API numbering.

Okay to commit either way, but I don't see the need for duplicate
definitions.