From: "Mark Andrews" Delivered-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org Message-ID: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Return-Path: content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) X-Original-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 X-RT-Interface: Email Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:43:37 +1100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) References: Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.pao1.isc.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87CFFD78B0A for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D789D3B4BF6 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A108016006D for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925D3160068 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id G3HL52Zf_BGV for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.30.42.89] (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20499160047 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:43:39 +0000 (UTC) To: bind9-public@isc.org Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #46709] isc_heap_delete not clearing index value X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mx.pao1.isc.org From marka@isc.org Tue Nov 28 07:43:42 2017 X-RT-Incoming-Encryption: Not encrypted RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 456 > On 28 Nov 2017, at 6:39 pm, Cathy Almond via RT wrote: > > What's the impact of this one on functionality/behaviour of BIND? Nothing as the code works around it at present. It’s just inconsistent behaviour in that every other operation updates the index when there is a callback specified. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org