X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Delivered-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: bind9-public@isc.org In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mx.pao1.isc.org X-Original-To: bind9-public@bugs.isc.org From ray@isc.org Wed Nov 29 21:51:46 2017 X-RT-Incoming-Encryption: Not encrypted Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.pao1.isc.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1F62D78B0A for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C92E3B1EFF for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0216C16007A for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC43E160079 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id JOYbKrGA6oiH for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rays-mbp.local (unknown [46.227.151.81]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48410160053 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:51:43 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US From: "Ray Bellis" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:51:41 +0000 Message-ID: <7c847a1e-32fb-6b09-9886-1ea5ec7f7015@isc.org> Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #46718] Clean up LMDB-related code X-RT-Interface: Email RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 504 On 29/11/2017 18:11, Michał Kępień via RT wrote: > Correct, but I failed to find a better term and "callback" should give > the reader the right idea. Plain "function" sounds too generic to me. > If you have any suggestions, I am all ears (or you can even push a > relevant tweak to the branch if you feel like it, as far as I am > concerned). "Callback" is already in common parlance in many cases when a function pointer is being passed even for immediate use, rather than asynchronously. Ray