X-RT-Interface: Email Message-ID: Delivered-To: bind9-confidential@bugs.isc.org Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.pao1.isc.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by bugs.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54D25D78B0D for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:17:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED6C43AB003 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF34C160088 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F9B160087 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 2KqABhy1V8j5 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.30.42.90] (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 366EF160048 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:16:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: bind9-confidential@bugs.isc.org In-Reply-To: To: bind9-confidential@isc.org X-RT-Incoming-Encryption: Not encrypted References: <8b0957c6-7d46-25ab-1b68-fb3809ee08db@trinnet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mx.pao1.isc.org From: "Mark Andrews" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From marka@isc.org Wed Jan 17 21:17:01 2018 Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #47015] Bind 9.11.2-P1 fails to compile but bind-9.10.6-P1 is fine X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:16:55 +1100 RT-Message-ID: Content-Length: 941 > On 18 Jan 2018, at 7:56 am, David Ranch via RT wrote: > > So.. with your help, we've found a solution but I'm curious how we > proceed here. Do you feel there is any issue with rolling out this new > binary (I doubt it)? How does ISC roll out build fixes for critical > security releases? Will they release a 9.11.2-P2 ASAP? Maybe you just > offer patches to help impacted users until you publish a new 9.11.x > release? > Just curious. There is no need to fix these security releases. You upgraded from BIND 9.10.X to BIND 9.11.X. BIND 9.10.6-P1 should compile fine on your system. The security fixes are minimal changes unlike performing a major version upgraded. Mark > --David > > > -- > Ticket History: https://bugs.isc.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=47015 -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org