Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.508 (Entity 5.508)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RT-Ticket-47061@isc.org>
 <rt-4.4.1-50502-1516913576-1135.47061-4-0@isc.org>
 <rt-4.4.1-50823-1516915654-1894.47061-4-0@isc.org>
 <79DC37C3-8638-4747-9D62-B4B26F8B514F@isc.org>
 <rt-4.4.1-54528-1516923324-618.47061-0-0@isc.org>
 <rt-4.4.1-67624-1517103205-149.47061-0-0@isc.org>
 <rt-4.4.1-67624-1517190476-504.47061-0-0@isc.org>
 <rt-4.4.1-3058-1517255131-1117.47061-0-0@isc.org>
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.1-67624-1517256344-158.47061-0-0@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.1-3058-1517255131-1117.47061-0-0@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Interface: Web
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
RT-Send-CC:
Content-Length: 631

On Mon Jan 29 09:45:31 2018, each wrote:
> On the one hand, there do exist systems that have type and don't have
> command.
> 
> On the other hand, none of those systems are in use in our test lab,
> whereas
> there are systems in our test lab that implement type
> idiosyncratically.
> Furthermore, in the event that anyone needs to run ATF unit tests on a
> system
> that's too old to have command, workarounds probably exist such as
> SHELL=/bin/bash.
> 
> I suggest rather than spending further developer time on this, let's
> just merge it. We can tidy it up later if it turns out to be
> necessary.

The branch or the patch?