Report information
The Basics
Id:
45110
Status:
open
Priority:
Low/Low
Queue:

People
Owner:
Nobody in particular
Cc:
AdminCc:

BugTracker
Version Fixed:
(no value)
Version Found:
(no value)
Versions Affected:
(no value)
Versions Planned:
(no value)
Priority:
(no value)
Severity:
(no value)
CVSS Score:
(no value)
CVE ID:
(no value)
Component:
(no value)
Area:
feature

Dates
Created:Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:11:48 -0400
Updated:Fri, 07 Jul 2017 12:12:24 -0400
Closed:Not set



This bug tracker is no longer active.

Please go to our Gitlab to submit issues (both feature requests and bug reports) for active projects maintained by Internet Systems Consortium (ISC).

Due to security and confidentiality requirements, full access is limited to the primary maintainers.

Subject: Integrate DHCP client prefix delegation size hint patch?
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:11:40 -0500
To: dhcp-suggest@isc.org
From: "Jason Spangler" <jasons@wumple.com>

Can we get this or another IPv6 prefix delegation size hint patch integrated into dhclient?  Several other DHCP clients support it already.

https://archive.mgm51.com/sources/pd-pref.html

Many ISPs only supply /56 or other non-/64 address ranges if the hint is sent, otherwise they default to /64.

The patch basically makes the #define'd length from this patch a run-time option:
https://source.isc.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=dhcp.git;a=commit;h=9279a3d722b3849b59a4bab17a2cec3b86e73fdc

I'd be willing to apply (or even re-write the patch to be a configuration file option) if given ability to submit a git pull request to the project.

Thanks,
-Jason


Message body not shown because it is not plain text.

Hello Jason: We already have this slated for our 4.4.0 release which should be out Q4/2017. I have linked this ticket with the existing request 43792, so you'll get notified when it's done. Thank you for taking the time to request it, user feedback is an important part of determining what features get addressed and when. Regards, Thomas Markwalder ISC Software Engineering On Tue Apr 18 20:11:48 2017, jasons@wumple.com wrote: > Can we get this or another IPv6 prefix delegation size hint patch > integrated into dhclient? Several other DHCP clients support it > already. > > https://archive.mgm51.com/sources/pd-pref.html > <https://archive.mgm51.com/sources/pd-pref.html> > > Many ISPs only supply /56 or other non-/64 address ranges if the hint > is > sent, otherwise they default to /64. > > The patch basically makes the #define'd length from this patch a > run-time option: > https://source.isc.org/cgi- > bin/gitweb.cgi?p=dhcp.git;a=commit;h=9279a3d722b3849b59a4bab17a2cec3b86e73fdc > > I'd be willing to apply (or even re-write the patch to be a > configuration file option) if given ability to submit a git pull > request > to the project. > > Thanks, > -Jason
Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #45110] Integrate DHCP client prefix delegation size hint patch?
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:35:40 -0500
To: dhcp-suggest@isc.org
From: "Jason Spangler" <jasons@wumple.com>
Thanks! On 4/19/2017 5:22 AM, Thomas Markwalder via RT wrote: > Hello Jason: > > We already have this slated for our 4.4.0 release which should be out Q4/2017. I have linked this ticket with the existing request 43792, so you'll get notified when it's done. > > Thank you for taking the time to request it, user feedback is an important part of determining what features get addressed and when. > > Regards, > > Thomas Markwalder > ISC Software Engineering > > > > On Tue Apr 18 20:11:48 2017, jasons@wumple.com wrote: >> Can we get this or another IPv6 prefix delegation size hint patch >> integrated into dhclient? Several other DHCP clients support it >> already. >> >> https://archive.mgm51.com/sources/pd-pref.html >> <https://archive.mgm51.com/sources/pd-pref.html> >> >> Many ISPs only supply /56 or other non-/64 address ranges if the hint >> is >> sent, otherwise they default to /64. >> >> The patch basically makes the #define'd length from this patch a >> run-time option: >> https://source.isc.org/cgi- >> bin/gitweb.cgi?p=dhcp.git;a=commit;h=9279a3d722b3849b59a4bab17a2cec3b86e73fdc >> >> I'd be willing to apply (or even re-write the patch to be a >> configuration file option) if given ability to submit a git pull >> request >> to the project. >> >> Thanks, >> -Jason > >

Message body not shown because it is not plain text.