Report information
The Basics
Id:
46353
Status:
rejected
Priority:
Low/Low
Queue:
dhcp-public
People
Owner:
Nobody in particular
Requestors:
Vicky Risk <vicky@isc.org>
Cc:
AdminCc:
BugTracker
Version Fixed:
(no value)
Version Found:
(no value)
Versions Affected:
(no value)
Versions Planned:
(no value)
Priority:
(no value)
Severity:
(no value)
CVSS Score:
(no value)
CVE ID:
(no value)
Component:
(no value)
Area:
feature
Attachments
Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 3.04.44 PM.png
Dates
Created:Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:44:33 -0400
Updated:Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:09:28 -0400
Closed:Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:09:28 -0400

This bug tracker is no longer active.

Please go to our Gitlab to submit issues (both feature requests and bug reports) for active projects maintained by Internet Systems Consortium (ISC).

Due to security and confidentiality requirements, full access is limited to the primary maintainers.

History
  Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:44:33 -0400 Vicky Risk <vicky@isc.org> - Ticket created
Subject: Fwd: option inheritance
To: "Thomas Markwalder via RT" <dhcp-suggest-comment@isc.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:44:55 -0700
From: "Victoria Risk" <vicky@isc.org>


this is what I am jabbering you about. I want to write up this and the same for address allocation, for Kea vs ISC DHCP

Begin forwarded message:

From: Victoria Risk <vicky@isc.org>
Subject: option inheritance
Date: October 17, 2017 at 8:36:43 AM PDT
To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz@isc.org>

is this the same for Kea??

this is from a presentatino I made up on ISC DHCP 4.3...




Victoria Risk
Internet Systems Consortium




Screen Shot 2017-10-16 at 3.04.44 PM.png

Image displayed inline above

  Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:09:27 -0400 Vicky Risk <vicky@isc.org> - Correspondence added

Sorry folks, this was a mis-directed email, I didn't mean to open a ticket!
Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:09:27 -0400 The RT System itself - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'
Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:09:28 -0400 Vicky Risk <vicky@isc.org> - Status changed from 'open' to 'rejected'