Report information
The Basics
Id:
46394
Status:
resolved
Priority:
Low/Low
Queue:

People
Owner:
Nobody in particular
Cc:
AdminCc:

BugTracker
Version Fixed:
9.9.12, 9.9.12(sub), 9.10.7, 9.10.7(sub), 9.11.3, 9.12.0
Version Found:
(no value)
Versions Affected:
(no value)
Versions Planned:
(no value)
Priority:
P2 Normal
Severity:
S2 Normal
CVSS Score:
(no value)
CVE ID:
(no value)
Component:
(no value)
Area:
bug

Dates
Created:Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:32:06 -0400
Updated:Tue, 31 Oct 2017 18:54:40 -0400
Closed:Tue, 31 Oct 2017 18:54:40 -0400



This bug tracker is no longer active.

Please go to our Gitlab to submit issues (both feature requests and bug reports) for active projects maintained by Internet Systems Consortium (ISC).

Due to security and confidentiality requirements, full access is limited to the primary maintainers.

From: marka@isc.org
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:32:06 -1000
To: bind9-public@isc.org
Subject: runtime system test failing under windows.
I suspect we need to use setfacl rather than chmod.
S:runtime:Wed Oct 11 18:33:53 PDT 2017 I:verifying that named started normally (1) I:verifying that named checks for conflicting named processes (2) I:verifying that 'lock-file none' disables process check (3) I: checking that named refuses to reconfigure if working directory is not writable (4) I:failed I: checking that named refuses to reconfigure if managed-keys-directory is not writable (5) I:failed I: checking that named refuses to start if working directory is not writable (6) I:failed I: checking that named refuses to start if managed-keys-directory is not writable (7) I:failed I:exit status: 4 R:FAIL E:runtime:Wed Oct 11 18:34:06 PDT 2017
ready for review
Looks okay from here. I'm not in a position to test it, though. I suggest merging it and firing a build-test cycle from https://jenkins.isc.org/view/BIND/job/bind9-parameterized-win2012-x64/
To: bind9-public@isc.org
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:07:03 +1100
Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #46394] runtime system test failing under windows.
From: "Mark Andrews" <marka@isc.org>
In message <rt-4.4.1-82815-1508993326-1785.46394-5-0@isc.org>, "Evan Hunt via R T" writes: > Looks okay from here. I'm not in a position to test it, though. > I suggest merging it and firing a build-test cycle from https://jenkins.isc.o > rg/view/BIND/job/bind9-parameterized-win2012-x64/ Running bind9-rt46394 in jenkins at the moment. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
> Running bind9-rt46394 in jenkins at the moment. Did it pass? If so, go ahead and commit.
On Fri Oct 27 08:51:08 2017, each wrote: > > > Running bind9-rt46394 in jenkins at the moment. > > Did it pass? If so, go ahead and commit. Needed more work. Windows handle of access when passed a directory is insane.
> Needed more work. Windows handle of access when passed a directory > is insane. Looks fine on inspection, but I haven't tested on windows - did you do another parameterized run? Okay to commit if so.