Report information
The Basics
Id:
36015
Status:
resolved
Priority:
Medium/Medium
Queue:

People
Owner:
Nobody in particular
Cc:
AdminCc:

BugTracker
Version Fixed:
9.11.0
Version Found:
(no value)
Versions Affected:
(no value)
Versions Planned:
(no value)
Priority:
(no value)
Severity:
S2 Normal
CVSS Score:
(no value)
CVE ID:
(no value)
Component:
(no value)
Area:
feature

Dates
Created:Thu, 15 May 2014 10:49:53 -0400
Updated:Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:42:25 -0400
Closed:Tue, 01 Jul 2014 19:22:53 -0400



This bug tracker is no longer active.

Please go to our Gitlab to submit issues (both feature requests and bug reports) for active projects maintained by Internet Systems Consortium (ISC).

Due to security and confidentiality requirements, full access is limited to the primary maintainers.

Subject: Feature request - break out # of automatic zones from "rndc status" zone count
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:49:50 -0500
To: bind9-bugs@isc.org
From: Alan Clegg <aclegg@info2intel.com>
Good morning, binders! "number of zones" in the output of "rndc status" is great, but splitting it into "number of automatic zones" and "number of our zones" (bad wording but I can't think of anything at the moment) would be nice... ie: root@server00:/etc/namedb/master# rndc status version: 9.10.0-P1 <id:e94d8db1> boot time: Thu, 15 May 2014 14:43:27 GMT last configured: Thu, 15 May 2014 14:43:27 GMT CPUs found: 1 worker threads: 1 UDP listeners per interface: 1 number of zones: 102 number of automatic zones: 98 number of our zones: 4 debug level: 0 xfers running: 0 xfers deferred: 0 soa queries in progress: 0 query logging is ON recursive clients: 0/0/1000 tcp clients: 0/100 server is up and running
CC: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #36015] Feature request - break out # of automatic zones from "rndc status" zone count
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 15:51:05 +0000
To: aclegg via RT <bind9-bugs@isc.org>
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
> Good morning, binders! > > "number of zones" in the output of "rndc status" is great, but splitting > it into "number of automatic zones" and "number of our zones" (bad > wording but I can't think of anything at the moment) would be nice... ie: By "automatic" I guess you mean empty zones, i.e. RFC 1918 reverse zones and such? > number of zones: 102 > number of automatic zones: 98 > number of our zones: 4 or maybe a breakdown: number of zones: 102 (4/98) (This opens up the thought of even further breakdowns -- how many configured via addzone vs named.conf, how many slaves vs. masters, etc.)