Report information
The Basics
Id:
35707
Status:
rejected
Priority:
Medium/Medium
Queue:

People
Owner:
Nobody in particular
Requestors:
Cc:
AdminCc:

BugTracker
Version Fixed:
(no value)
Version Found:
(no value)
Versions Affected:
(no value)
Versions Planned:
(no value)
Priority:
(no value)
Severity:
(no value)
CVSS Score:
(no value)
CVE ID:
(no value)
Component:
(no value)
Area:
(no value)

Dates
Created:Mon, 07 Apr 2014 07:27:20 -0400
Updated:Fri, 07 Jul 2017 20:53:30 -0400
Closed:Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:04:47 -0400



This bug tracker is no longer active.

Please go to our Gitlab to submit issues (both feature requests and bug reports) for active projects maintained by Internet Systems Consortium (ISC).

Due to security and confidentiality requirements, full access is limited to the primary maintainers.

CC: Tomas Hozza <thozza@redhat.com>
Subject: Support for draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance ?
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:27:07 +0200
To: bind-suggest@isc.org
From: Petr Spacek <pspacek@redhat.com>
Hello, I would like to know if you are planning to support http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-03 in a near future. It seems that sections 3 and 5 are stable and rest of the draft seems to be not very interesting for DNS servers. I wonder if you can: - add support for CDS and CDNSKEY records - add a switch (for in-line signing and dnssec-signzone) "always copy all DNSKEY records to CDNSKEY records and also to CDS records". IMHO this behavior is allowed: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-03#section-5 Thank you for your time. -- Petr Spacek @ Red Hat
Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #35707] Support for draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance ?
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:30:04 +1000
To: bind-suggest@isc.org
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In message <rt-3.8.6-32683-1396870041-508.35707-3-0@isc.org>, "Petr Spacek via RT" writes: > > Hello, > > I would like to know if you are planning to support > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-03 > in a near future. > > It seems that sections 3 and 5 are stable and rest of the draft seems to be > not very interesting for DNS servers. > > I wonder if you can: > - add support for CDS and CDNSKEY records It's a little early to ask for CDNSKEY as there is no type code assigned. > - add a switch (for in-line signing and dnssec-signzone) "always copy all > DNSKEY records to CDNSKEY records and also to CDS records". > > IMHO this behavior is allowed: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-03# > section-5 > > Thank you for your time. > > -- > Petr Spacek @ Red Hat > > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #35707] Support for draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance ?
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 16:43:17 +0200
To: bind-suggest@isc.org
From: Petr Spacek <pspacek@redhat.com>
On 7.4.2014 16:30, Mark Andrews via RT wrote: > In message <rt-3.8.6-32683-1396870041-508.35707-3-0@isc.org>, "Petr Spacek via > RT" writes: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to know if you are planning to support >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-03 >> in a near future. >> >> It seems that sections 3 and 5 are stable and rest of the draft seems to be >> not very interesting for DNS servers. >> >> I wonder if you can: >> - add support for CDS and CDNSKEY records > > It's a little early to ask for CDNSKEY as there is no type code assigned. I'm sorry! I have seen code 59 for CDS and (wrongly) anticipated that CDNSKEY is also assigned ... Thank you for your time once again! Petr^2 Spacek > >> - add a switch (for in-line signing and dnssec-signzone) "always copy all >> DNSKEY records to CDNSKEY records and also to CDS records". >> >> IMHO this behavior is allowed: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-03# >> section-5 >> >> Thank you for your time.
Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #35707] Support for draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance ?
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 10:24:15 +0200
To: bind-suggest@isc.org
From: Petr Spacek <pspacek@redhat.com>
On 7.4.2014 16:43, Petr Spacek via RT wrote: > On 7.4.2014 16:30, Mark Andrews via RT wrote: >> In message <rt-3.8.6-32683-1396870041-508.35707-3-0@isc.org>, "Petr Spacek via >> RT" writes: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like to know if you are planning to support >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-03 >>> in a near future. >>> >>> It seems that sections 3 and 5 are stable and rest of the draft seems to be >>> not very interesting for DNS servers. >>> >>> I wonder if you can: >>> - add support for CDS and CDNSKEY records >> >> It's a little early to ask for CDNSKEY as there is no type code assigned. > > I'm sorry! I have seen code 59 for CDS and (wrongly) anticipated that CDNSKEY > is also assigned ... According to http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/dns-parameters.txt CDS and CDNSKEY RR types have type codes assigned now and the RFC seems to be close to publication. It would be nice to get support for them when possible. Thank you! Petr Spacek >>> - add a switch (for in-line signing and dnssec-signzone) "always copy all >>> DNSKEY records to CDNSKEY records and also to CDS records". >>> >>> IMHO this behavior is allowed: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-03# >>> section-5 >>> >>> Thank you for your time.
Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #35707] Support for draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance ?
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 19:22:17 +1000
To: bind-suggest@isc.org
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
These are in the upcoming betas. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
Subject: Re: [ISC-Bugs #35707] Support for draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance ?
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:46:55 +0200
To: bind-suggest@isc.org
From: Petr Spacek <pspacek@redhat.com>
On 2.7.2014 11:22, Mark Andrews via RT wrote: > These are in the upcoming betas. Great, thank you! -- Petr Spacek @ Red Hat